Jumat, 10 Januari 2014

186
Jurnal Hadhari 4 (2) (2012) 183 - 186
of the Islamic Academy i.e. the Organization of Islamic Conference in Jeddah
and the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions
(AAOIFI); 3) no methodology to clarify and make binding the best way to
research Islamic issues; and 4) lack of association to organize regular meeting
of all boards’ members. The writer also has discussed on six recommended
outlines for the third problem. The outlines were laid in the opinion of the
writer in order to make clear and informative methodology in transmission
process in making reference to jurists’ opinions which are follows; 1) the
word of
mufti
is referring to the word
mujtahid
, if one cannot complete the
requirement of being
mujtahid
, he only can be considered as a transmitter of
opinions; 2) thus the writer made it refers to the members of the board cannot
be referred as a
mufti
as they are the transmitter of the Shari’ah ruling; 3) a
jurists who has opportunity to transmit the opinions of the
mazhabs
in a given
issue, must be in one of two categories, either he is committed to following
particular
mazhabs
or he has more extensive knowledge; 4) the members of
the board should aware of the opinions of the jurists from all the recorded
mazhabs
on the issue they were made reference to; 5) they must be consistent
in transmitting the
Shari’ah
ruling for any issue from its sources; and 6) then,
there is no harm if they differ in giving preference to the particular opinion
they consider to be supported by the strongest evidence or that best achieves
public interest.
 
untuk melihat lebih lengkap

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar